Just my place where I can put what I want, and read what people think about what I said.
Published on April 29, 2008 By Nequa In Everything Else
As China continues to rise without any signs of stoping, it seems more and more likly that America is going to be second place. Will America fall into second, or will china succues stop and America will be number one until the next up and coming country wants to take first. What do you think?
Comments (Page 24)
40 PagesFirst 22 23 24 25 26  Last
on May 16, 2008
Lets reverse tactics. Buy ice cream for Bin Laden and waterboard your children.
on May 16, 2008
yeah cultural relativism is for pansy lib'rals until you get to places that aren't Middle Eastern in which case there's a free pass. if it's not X hard, it's not beating! it's loving childcare! the only way to make your children act responsibly is to beat the shit out of them *only a little*.


learn to read. i said smacking, not beating the shit out of them *only a little*

and its not called loving childcare, its called Discipline.

that's great anecdotal evidence paired with a strawman but not only do you not know what you're talking about (numerous studies over the last 30+ years have shown that hitting children does absolutely nothing and encourages violent behavior) that has nothing to do with the topic.


do you know what you are talking about? those "studies" are statistical in nature. they dont show the whole picture. things like their culture, the ambient where they grew up, their education, their wealth, or the parental failures of their parents dont show up in those numbers.

with a sufficiently large variable "enemies". who are our "enemies"? iraq? afghanistan? i doubt ethanol really has to do with hunger there. states that are vaguely hostile like Venezuela? no, they aren't having a problem. the lower dollar also means it's much easier for foreign countries to buy agricultural imports, so point's moot there too.


Again, do you know what you are talking about? Venezuela is a enemy of the US. Do you know who is Hugo Chavez? And do you know how he refers to the imperial US? HINT: I just gave you a hint. And agricultural imports are going up in price, you heard of the increase in price of rice?

generally speaking, the objective we've accomplished is the following: remove Saddam Hussein's government. technically, we could have done that any number of ways. until we achieve objectives like "restoring electricity" or "setting up a government that's not dominated by Sunni extremists or Shiite American puppets" (neither of which look quite on-track), we might as well just have shot a cruise missile into Saddam's house and called it a day back in 2003.


I'm impressed, you do know what you are talking about here.
on May 16, 2008
America is the world power. It has a powerful military and it's economy is big. It also holds a policy of the "Last Empire." Basically this means that when America falls, it will take everyone with them. They have the weapons and everything to do it. If they start to go down hill then they will live on through fear.
on May 16, 2008

Let him speak freely, its his right.


How did I stop him from speaking? He's welcome to his opinions, as is anyone, just as I am welcome to dismiss said opinions as uninformed.
on May 16, 2008
Let him speak freely, its his right.How did I stop him from speaking? He's welcome to his opinions, as is anyone, just as I am welcome to dismiss said opinions as uninformed.


yea, and it is my post.
on May 16, 2008
What one has to understand is we hold the power to destroy the world not once but 12 times over with nuclear weapons.China is a big threat to the United States and also we cnttrrol almoost 50% oof the world money, and what obama says is tthatwe should talk with are enemys and down size are Armed forces, and when World War 3 happens will be screwed. But the funny thing is we will go out with a nuclear bang wiping china out with us. VOTE REPUBLICAN PROTECT THE AMERICAN EMPIRE!!!
on May 16, 2008
But the funny thing is we will go out with a nuclear bang wiping china out with us


Well that's a relief.

Tell me... have you ever disconned a multiplayer RTS game because you were going to lose?
on May 17, 2008
The ignorance of the world population on nukes is truly scary...

The entire supply of nuclear weapons on this earth can't even kill everyone in Asia. The resulting population kill of the most effective spread would be massive, but that's because of how many people live in large cities. Once you get to rural areas, they do dick. Once you get into uneven ground, they really do dick. The Himalayan mountain range would use up everything we've got. Now if we made a couple hundred thousand more, maybe. The radiation wont kill people, it will kill some people, and cause a lot of cancer. Would it suck, hell yes, but we can't wipe out the world. The nuclear winter thing is a joke. Mankind survived the ice ages, of which there have been a lot, mankind would survive the comparatively mild effects of nuclear winter. Most of the smaller munitions, the tactical nukes that comprise the vast majority, wont even contribute much to a global cooling. Stop watching Hollywood horror movies written by high school dropouts with no common sense. Aside from being horribly inaccurate, they suck.

Seriously now, end the perpetuation of Hollywood myths please.

Nequa, liberal idiots have been running the educational system for too long. "Child abuse" promotes aggressive tendencies, like slugging some asshole when he tries to walk all over you, or shooting the guy that breaks into your home to steal from you. Reacting with violence is an unacceptable situation, regardless of whether it's appropriate. Consequences for your actions are supposed to be restricted to painless methods, like free room and board with cable tv and a gym in a medium security flophouse for murderers.

Spanking your children, even if they aren't harmed by it(and no legitimate study has ever found spanking harmful), teaches them that consequences can be painful, and that such consequences are reasonable to apply to others.

Carbon, since you seem to not see it, the difference between spanking and beating. Spanking does no physical damage, it's a mental note. It leaves at worst, red marks that take a few hours to fade. Beatings leave cuts, bruises, broken bones, injuries to your organs. They are not a painful reminder not to do something, they injure. If someone slaps you for sassing them, and someone else breaks your jaw, I think you'll be able to tell the difference.

Ghostwes, wonderfully stupid replies. What better education on a subject is there than first hand knowledge? If only he had a doctorate in child psychology and no children he'd be able to understand the finer points of discipline! Being a well educated idiot doesn't make someone smart, just arrogant. Kinda like we are, eh?
on May 17, 2008
What one has to understand is we hold the power to destroy the world not once but 12 times over with nuclear weapons.China is a big threat to the United States and also we cnttrrol almoost 50% oof the world money, and what obama says is tthatwe should talk with are enemys and down size are Armed forces, and when World War 3 happens will be screwed. But the funny thing is we will go out with a nuclear bang wiping china out with us. VOTE REPUBLICAN PROTECT THE AMERICAN EMPIRE!!!


Man, this thread is becoming silly. That's the worst impression of a Republican I have ever seen. You probably work for Clinton's campaign. I mean, come on... nobody is that stupid.

Ghostwes, wonderfully stupid replies. What better education on a subject is there than first hand knowledge? If only he had a doctorate in child psychology and no children he'd be able to understand the finer points of discipline! Being a well educated idiot doesn't make someone smart, just arrogant. Kinda like we are, eh?


psychoak, you do understand that he used child abuse as a metaphor to justify the invasion of Iraq, right? This isn't really about child abuse, despite your attempt to make it so.
on May 17, 2008
The Futurist, a blog I enjoy following from time to time, had a great article on China and whether we'll keep our hyperpower status (there can be multiple superpowers, BTW.): http://futurist.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/05/why_the_us_will.html

The problems facing China are mostly cultural. That's not to say they can't do it, and anyways, as an American I welcome the competition. People look at global trade as though it's us vs. them. In reality, America has much to gain from economic booms in other countries.

We put a man on the moon only after the space race with the Soviet Union. I don't know if we would have done it otherwise, and even if we would it would have been much later. Competition is good for America, I don't know why more people realize that.
on May 28, 2008
This is 100% not true. Simply look to the excellent health care in nations like Canada, Cuba, Sweden, the UK, etc.. etc..


As a Canadian I can tell you that our health care system is not in fact excellent. We are taxed at a higher rate in Canada than most industrial nations and yet nearly 40 cents on every dollar in taxes goes to health care. Despite this huge expenditure it is routine to have to wait months for diagnostic testing, and years for routine surgeries. Oh sure if you're dying you get fast and excellent care but if you can't walk because of a bad knee you had better be prepared hobble for a looong time.

The main reason for this is 100% publicly funded and delivered health care mandated by law and socialist ideology. I definately don't believe that the system in the U.S. where insurance companies who are accountable to their investors are the gatekeepers of care is necessarily a good system either. You could argue a capitalist ideology Yet many European systems with mix of both public and private insurance are the best health care systems in the world. Providing the best care for less money. Proving once again that pragmatism trumps ideology every time no matter what side of the political spectrum you fall on.
on May 31, 2008
Proving once again that pragmatism trumps ideology every time no matter what side of the political spectrum you fall on.


And that to me is the key point. Every Nation has its own Culture, and a different way of struturing its economy.

Crude example: in UK the short distances traveled by car compared to the US and the less dense public transport in the more open areas of the US are for a reason - the dynamics of real world life in respective Countries. The outcome is a different structure in Oil / Petrol taxes. Is one more "right" than the other - No. Its the pragmatic reality of each country concerned, realities that the other does not have to face. That was driven home to me when on the British Training area near Medicine Hat, Alberta Canada.

In a conversation with one of the locals, he casually mentioned they usually "popped into" Calgary for the weekly shop on a Saturday. Its 142 miles one way for crying out loud!! Its a bit like in UK someone living in Manchester saying they "popped into London" for the weekly shop ...... utterly inconceivable in UK, well for the sane ones amongst us anyway

Different Country, different dynamics, different solutions. What is crucial though - in any system - is to minimise short term tinkering, it always leads to mayhem. To cherry pick one aspect of one Country and almost say "yaboo its better there" does not hold true. Each Country evolves for its own unique circumstances and culture, there's no right or wrong.

One of my wife's favorite sayings is "what they really mean is, its not that they cant afford it, its because they choose to spend their money in other ways - you cant have your cake and eat it", and I fully agree. There are obvious limitations to that which is readily acknowledged, particularly if someone is literally on the bread line, it is however a very good way of expressing many of these dilemaes.

Regards
Zy
on Sep 07, 2008

Ever since man has stabilized and has started to build Empires, Nations, Alliances, and Democracies, the world has been at war. As said by John F. Kennedy, serving as President of the United States of America from 1960-1963,:

"A Man May Die, Nations May Rise and Fall, But an Idea Lives on."

An average Empire, (70% of the time a rebellionist group that revolted from a larger, more critical mothercountry), lasts about eighty to six-hundred years. For Example, the Roman Empire lasted from around 300 B.C. to (around) 300 A.D. Six-hundred years.

America, ever since 1776, has been it's own, independent country. We have created many world-changing vehicles, equipment, technology, and transportation. We have defined the words Peace, Celebrate and Happy, and have defined the words Slaughter, Kill, and Annihilate.For the past 300 years, America has been a growing country, and an impressive one at that.

The problem is, when will we fall from the list of Superpowers of the World? Five months? Five years? Five-hundred years? No one knows for sure, but all we know is this: Not If, but when.

If say, in 2020 Russia gained an economic advantage over the United States and the rest of the UN, and rebuilt their "Glorious Motherland" into a well built, economically rish country, with a military rivaling the World's on it's own.

They invade and totally destroy the United States. Within, say, five years, rebellions would start across the world from mass-starvation. Millions are killed, and the Russians control the world.

But then, the world's people revolt in one mass-attack and overrun Russia. America is still gone, but, of course, the ideas the Great Founding Fathers thought of still Live On.

If, say, in 2015, China invades and destroys America. I'm saying it in 2015 instead of 2020 because China has a military advantage over Russia (Russia has been falling apart these past years). Rebellions rise up but are quickly cut down with mass-execution. Two billion people are dead.

If America fell, the world would be at a disadvantage. A perfect example is The Roman Empire. It grew so large it fell apart because it could not sustain itself with just one man. Those men were power-hungry and would kill for controlling the world.

America falling from the list of nations in the world would obviously shock the world, but 76% of the people knowing that would be happy. Why? Because they think we are greedy bastards.

The French, for example, have been jealous of us and the British since WWII, which ended in 1945. Why?

The Nazis invaded France in 1940 and we helped take it back. They were jealous, and therefore angry, at us. They couldn't fight the Nazis off because they came with lighting force.

Anyway, countries like France may never make the Superpowers List, but who knows. By tomorrow, New Zealand would have released a biological chemical that could kill millions of people in an instant.


The Point is, In the stories, Good Guys always win, to make the reader/watcher feel better. But in reality, the Bad Guys could win and even endanger our species. America has protected and played part in most events in history, and have stood side-by-side with their allies to the bitter end against the Evil Masterminds plotting against them.

 

I conclude my story.

on Sep 07, 2008

China:Will collaped becasue if the USA stock market crash that force tons of people homeless.

Look at china They care about the olympics more then it own citizens. (the olympics site was a historical site)

USA: Will be A super power unless the USA will be like the EU

Europe: Possable if they become a super nation.

Africa: No they not yet to be industrized yet.

South america: Save as Africa

 

Look at history: Some empires last very long as the superpower and some die out overnight.

on Sep 07, 2008

Good one.

40 PagesFirst 22 23 24 25 26  Last