Just my place where I can put what I want, and read what people think about what I said.
I have norton, but from what I hear norton sucks. Does any body know a better anti-virus software?
Comments (Page 3)
16 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last
on Nov 12, 2008

It's good to have them in case of human error - I remember managing to get a PC at work infected because I had toggled my ultra-high Internet Explorer settings off for a specific site, got called off to do something else, and spaced toggling them back on again when I was on the net and got infected by a site.

Had to disinfect manually because I was damned if I was going to risk losing admin rights by pulling in the IT people to look at my machine - which, come to think of it undermines my point since we *had* AV protection and it wasn't stopping it and I had to dig through it manually to kill the lil' sob - {G}.

Or plan B - use Linux - Ubuntu rocks - {G}.

Jonnan

on Nov 12, 2008

and most importantly be an intelligent user of the internet and stay away from emails with attachments (unless you know the sender)

Truer words were never spoken!!!

Avoid Norton: it corrupts your network dlls which can and reliably causes rafts of problems gaming (from first-hand experience).

Ditto!  Based on personal experience and three recuts... (OK, yeah, I'm a little slow)

McAfee VirusScan

Again, ditto!  The one I've finally settled on and used for a while with no probs.  And this is the free version from my ISP progvider.

on Nov 12, 2008

There isn't one. Period.

on Nov 12, 2008

I still have Norton 'cause its well known.  There earlier version where notorious when it came to eating up resources and performance.  2008 version made significant improvements in adressing that problem.  I never had a problem with 2008 as far as performance is concern.  The key is to not only do you need to keep norton up to date but you also need to keep your Windows OS up to date with the latest security patch.  Base on my observation, norton seem to update the virus security around the windows security.  Just an observation.

I recently upgraded Norton 2009.  At first, it was working find.  But then, the endless message box keep poping up.  Everytime, it update itself, everytime it does a background scan, a message window kept poping up.  It has a silent mode feature, which, is completely useless since your could only leave it in silent mode for up to six hours.  Why only six hours?  I can't figure it out.  Personally if you going to have a silent mode feature, I think as the user I should have the right to keep silent permanently.  It called being user friendly.  I wonder what moron decided to limit to silent mode feature.  Those message windows were beginning to irritate me to the point where I just ended up having to disable the service alltogether. If you have 2008 version stick to it.  I've already filde a complaint regarding this problem.  I'll see how it goes.  Luckily there is plenty of AV software out there to choose from.

Just lock me up, I'll eat the key.

on Nov 12, 2008

I use:

Firefox internet browser

Avira antivirus

Spybot Search and Destroy

I clicked on at least 3 keylogger links on WoW site forums and my account still haven't been touched. Windows Vista.

on Nov 12, 2008

Lot's of good common sense advice in this thread. I'll put in one more plug for Kaspersky Internet Security Suite. I'm using version 7.0 but the 2009 version is out now and I assume it's similar. As has already been mentioned you can and should try before you buy. But the reason I prefer it is because it's a small compact package that has everthing accessible through a single system tray icon and has a very small memory footprint, only spawning two process to cover all security functions (Firewall, AV, Anti-Spam, Anti-Phishing).

on Nov 12, 2008

I have been using Trend for 8 years with no problems. But I have to agree with the person that said whatever works best with you computer, is best.

on Nov 12, 2008

I wouldnt use any free versions as they dont catch everything thats out there.

Not entirely true. The free version of AVG is the same detection engine as the paid version of AVG. It's just that the paid version has more features for power users.

. . . and a zero day exploit will even catch people with antivirus software, so it's always important to have backups and layered protection.

I've been using AVG, but may have to switch for two reasons:

-Its false positive rate is amazingly high.  A file that looks like a virus one day is an "oops, that wasn't really a virus" the next update. In fact, it's so bad that a recent updated hosed systems by detecting Windows system files as viruses.

Luckily, I have it currently set to confirm with me instead of automatically "healing" stuff - because it has deleted files that were important to me.

-It also slows down my browser by an incredible amount whenever Web Shield is on. Pages constantly time out and I'm left waiting and reloading. AVG may be fast in some areas, but it's slow for internet surfing.

I'm currently considering Comodo's antivirus, since I use their software firewall.

Maybe once every couple of months I run Windows Live One Care Safety Scanner. It's free and you don't download it to you computer.

I prefer something that's on my computer and can be scheduled to run on a regular basis and have an active resident scanner. A web scanner is unlikely to be able to detect viruses that may be actively hiding themselves and does not provide any preventative measures against viruses installing themselves.

On board virus scanners and other installed security software have a definitive advantage of being able to detect known viruses before they are executed, and take actions to prevent them from installing themselves in the first place. It's much better that a virus never enter your system in the first place than to find it later after it has already established itself.

The best way to prevent viruses is to make sure they can't be installed in the first place. Backups, firewalls, keeping systems patched, resident virus scanners, and safe computing practices are all ways to prevent them from getting installed in the first place.

Am i the only one who doesnt use one?

I highly advise using layered protection for the best security. Yeah, they still need to work on making their stuff a bit more transparent and less intrusive - but none of these programs protect against everything, so it's much better to have several different types of protection.

on Nov 12, 2008

I use the new Norton 2009 internet suite, it is very lite on resources and is very well rated. What is also very nice, is that it does its job and isnt constantly nagging at me.   It know how to do what it does and is very nice. Its not free, but a trial on line will run for 15 days. I like it alot. Oh... also, there are 2008 versions promoted by BankAmerica online that are free to use.   But you will need to make sure your system is modern as the 2008 version does tend to slow things down when it runs. Other programs i have used are SuperAntiSpyware, AVG Free, AVAST, and Avira. Avira is very very good, but does have an ad for the pro version in it. Their are lots of good AV programs available. Just read the reviews and try them out. You will know if they are right if they work in a way that is comfortable for you. ( I like my scanner to always run when i startup) some programs will be a hassle to use, or slow, or not run scheduled scans. Even the one's that are prefectly legitimate. Other users like convenience, like me!    And that is why i use what i use (Norton) but not everyone likes it, for there own personal reasons. Anyway, read the reviews on the net, find maybe half a dozen, (haha, if you like find over a dozen!)   and then try them out.    Good luck!!

-Teal

 

on Nov 12, 2008

IMO - The best FREE AV is Avast or AVG (though personally I prefer Avast, I have also used AVG effectively). While I have little experience with most paid AV programs, I have used Norton, which qualifies as malware. It is bloated, spreads it tentacles throughout the OS, is difficult to remove, and provides a significant performance hit.

I would not recommend going without AV software. You can always save CPU cycles by turning off the real-time protection and using the scanner periodically.

on Nov 12, 2008

I use AVG 8.0, windows defender, Vista Firewall, am running Vista Ultimate 32, since its release, and i have yet to be infected, AVG has found virii, ( after my children have used it-even though they are adults) I had been using McAfee (free suite for Comcast users) but it is such a resource hog, added 30 seconds to boot time)

on Nov 12, 2008

forgot to add, just being careful is good, like most posters above have stated, but i do like AVG, a couple false positives here and there just after installing, but thats it, so there is my 2 cents for AVG, enough so i bought it. AVG has a Link Scanner and Web Scanner, i had nothing but problems with these, so i turn them off, oh and i spend most of my time here on Stardock/Wincustomize (seeing i have no life LOL) and sports sites,

on Nov 12, 2008

NOD32 hands down, Avast would be my second choice.

on Nov 12, 2008

Currently running without any.

Ran for years with - various flavours - and never got a virus, never even trapped any before they got to me.

Most recent one I tried was AVG Free version, which was quite good but they started to nag a lot for me to upgrade to the paid version.

The fastest static scan I have found is the current version of nod32 - 2:15 for 500+GB.

I run a static scan every now and then using a random choice of on-line scanners or free trials - just to confirm I'm not being nuts, and I'm still not finding anything.

However, I am the sole user of my system and am a very, very careful user who knows what he is doing (at a professional level) and has zero interest in anything that could even be considered remotely likely to be dangerous to my PC's health.  If you can't honestly claim to be the same then you must resort to software solutions.

I recently installed the free version of Avira on a family members PC as I had heard good things about it.  It started popping up scare messages like "I am a hacker and could steall all your stuff! You need the full version of Avira to be properly protected".  That went in the bit bucket pronto.

I do run SpyBot Serarch & Destroy regularly and allow it to "Immunize" my system, but don't even bother with its resident protection.  It never finds anything either - except a few benign tracking cookies.

I also have a hardware firewall.

on Nov 12, 2008

Just wanted to say I really liked this post and learned lots from it. So far I’ve used Norton and since I’ve had no problems will just stick with it for now.

16 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last