Just my place where I can put what I want, and read what people think about what I said.
When humanity can colinize planets, and wage space warfae how will the world react, will we form one great nation of the world, divide up into diffrent alliances, or go of on are own in a world wide space race. Will that day be the beggingi of a new age or just another age where countyrs try to out do each other. Basically I am tyring to say is what do you think is going to happen earth and countrys when we reach Galciv2 technology? whenever that will be. 
Comments (Page 5)
18 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7  Last
on May 05, 2008
I'm not a physesist, but i do think that involves recoil, as you are in a sence propelling somthing fowards. which, in space, would send you flying backwards.
They are quite impressive though, i agree.
But i could be wrong, we just have to wait 1000 years or so and see what kind of stuff we start putting on our ships. lol. unless we reincarnate to another planet, in another galaxy.
on May 05, 2008
I'm not a physesist, but i do think that involves recoil, as you are in a sence propelling somthing fowards. which, in space, would send you flying backwards.
They are quite impressive though, i agree.
But i could be wrong, we just have to wait 1000 years or so and see what kind of stuff we start putting on our ships. lol. unless we reincarnate to another planet, in another galaxy.
on May 05, 2008
"Most scientists beleive that about 1% of the planets in the galaxy are suited for life and that doesn't include whatever species that might actually be intelligent life."[run sarcasm.exe]Hey, guys, listen up! I'm aware that we haven't left our solar system yet, nor have we discovered a truly practical way to travel through space, and thus don't know much byond our little neck of the galactic woods, but let's listen to the scientists making huge extrapolations. They're scientists, so they can't be wrong![terminate sarcams.exe]


you never ended it! Thats a different .exe!
on May 05, 2008
The rail gun does cause recoil, in fact even worse then standard guns, the magnetic force forces the two rails in the gun (that conduct electricity) in opposite directions, in space that could cause the ship to begin spinning at the same speed the progectile is fired from the ship. which would make it highly ineffective as a weapon, until prouper gravity and anti gravity technology is invented, if ever.
Basicly you would need either beam weapons (which are rather complicated to make useful as weapons) and self guided missles, which propell themselvs, as they wouldn't directly effect the ship itself.
on May 05, 2008
The rail gun does cause recoil, in fact even worse then standard guns, the magnetic force forces the two rails in the gun (that conduct electricity) in opposite directions, in space that could cause the ship to begin spinning at the same speed the progectile is fired from the ship.

I'm pretty sure the forces are just perpendicular to the rails along the horizontal axis(pulling apart) so it shouldn't cause spinning. The problem today with railguns is engineering the rails to withstand multiple shots without warping or weakening from stress. If you have found a properly drawn force diagram then please correct me.
on May 05, 2008
if we ever have the ability to effectively colonize planets not in our solar system we probably wont have wars. Wars are caused by pressure for resources if every group has thier own planets it kind of negates the need to fight over stuff.You're joking, right? Please tell me your not that naive.Lets start with the various Crusades, Jihads, purges, and other stupidity "in the name of God!" Then lets move on to the fact that its easier to take the infrastructure and wealth from someone else than to develop it yourself. Then lets move on to genuine political issues, and finally the fact that the resources available in the galaxy are finite -- eventually there will be "pressure for resources" again.


Actually both the Crusades and Jihads were a product of economics pressures.

on May 05, 2008
Considering the relatively small scale of our solar system, stars, etc. in comparison with other in the galaxy that we only know are there through telescopes and mathematic calculations, I think the "1% of the galaxy can support life" theory is absolutely ridiculous. There are simply too many stars and planets in our galaxy for us to impetuously assume that we as living things are such a rare commodity in the infinite universe. We haven't even been able to travel to the edge of our own solar system!

Also, I think that given the implications of time and lightyears, the only way we would come across another species in space would be on the off-chance that they had superiorly-developed travel technologies and were primarily focused on space exploration. More likely scenarios would involve either us discovering intelligent life that was based on a planet, or intrepid aliens passing through our solar system to collect resources from our solar system before we even muster the technology for that kind of travel.

It's even feasible to think that this may have already happened, if what they theorize about past life on Mars to be true.

As far as wars, Humans would probably be stupid enough to develop their technology for something so impractical as space battles just to prove that it were possible.
It may very well be contact with other intelligent life that unites us as a species, but then we become racially-proud and seek out to destroy and control "alien scum".
The opposite could also happen, with those of us being utterly fascinated and desiring peaceful contact with alien species.

Such a thing could also cause a rift in our own species, as Humans tend to react to new cultures and discoveries in two ways; either fearful aggression, or awed fascination. Depending on the attitude of said intelligent life, this could either cause us to fight amongst each other in defense of the new alien culture versus our traditional pride, or it could cause those fascinated to be enslaved and the distrustful to fight the aliens in an effort to exact revenge for their lost brethren.

The possibilities are endless, based completely on the many facets of circumstance.
on May 05, 2008
Spacepony you replied a while ago. the myans were primitive and confused about the future. the world will not end in december of 2012 just becouse our solor system passes thru the center of the Milky way. i do apolijize if i offend you but it is illogical to assume a primitive civ could predict the future so accuratly
on May 05, 2008
for example there are eleven dimensions, as humans we can currently comprehend 3 up, down, and side to side there are 8 more!


A STRING THEORIST! RUNNNNN!!!!
on May 05, 2008
Sorry for the double post, but...

For those of you interested in the probability of extraterrestrial life (that we can contact), read up on Drake's Equation. It makes some simplifying assumptions but the statistics turn out interesting!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation
on May 05, 2008
Personally, I think the answer to our problems is to build a giant space weapon of some sort (perhaps ring shaped) which when fired, destroys all life in the galaxy (or solar system) then the human race will have all its problems resolved.
on May 06, 2008
Haha. Yea lets blow up the universe! Life sucks anyways, we'll be doing the universe a favor!
on May 06, 2008
Hmm, yes...and then our problems will totally be solved, as we'll have only our own petty problems to focus on, much like now. (Not to mention that SETI would become an utterly dead project. And to any new life-forms that arise years later, we'd be the ultimate proprietors of genocide.)

That is if this mucho-destructive weapon doesn't cause something in our solar system to go off-kilter and send un-manned space craft to go careening into our atmosphere how ever many years later. A giant wave of space junk wipes out all mankind in some ironic twist of fated retribution.
on May 08, 2008
Here's some of the possible futures for a united Earth, assuming we don't destroy ourselves first.

At one end of the spectrum is the entire planet united under a democratic world state, which isn't exactly on the horizon right now.

Second is a loose coalition of nations/superpowers united under a democracy leading the rest of the world, sort of like my Earth Federation.

Third is a aristocratic republic with somewhat tight governmental control on the population.

Fourth is a monarchy, a la the Terran Empire.

At the other end of the spectrum is a facist dictatorship.

Note: this was just speculation, don't over-anylise it.
on May 12, 2008
Why don't we just leave them alone?  


Because humans are stupid!!!
18 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7  Last